Introduction to the Companies Act, 2013
The Companies Act, 2013, is one of the most critical legal frameworks governing corporate entities
in India. It lays down the rules and regulations that businesses need to follow to operate in
compliance with Indian law. This Act not only ensures smooth functioning of companies but also
enforces transparency, accountability, and corporate governance. Among the many provisions it
includes, Section 248 stands out as a significant measure to manage the existence of
companies, particularly inactive or non-functioning entities.
What is Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013?
Section 248 grants the Registrar of Companies (RoC) the power to
strike off the name of a company from the register of companies. It applies to companies that have
either become defunct or have failed to comply with certain statutory requirements. This section was
introduced to ensure that the corporate registry only contains active, compliant companies.
The Power of the Registrar to Remove Company Names
Under Section 248, the Registrar has the authority to remove the
name of a company from the register if certain conditions are met. These conditions are often linked
to inactivity, non-compliance, or failure to fulfill legal obligations.
Grounds for Removal of Company Names
Some of the common grounds for invoking Section 248 include:
Voluntary Application for Removal by the Company
In addition to the Registrar's powers, a company can voluntarily apply to have its name struck
off from the register. This typically happens when a company is no longer in operation and the
management wishes to dissolve the entity without going through the lengthy winding-up process.
Conditions and Eligibility for Voluntary Removal
For voluntary striking off, the company must fulfill specific requirements:
Involuntary Striking Off by the Registrar
In some cases, the Registrar initiates the removal process without any request
from the company. This happens when the company fails to comply with the legal provisions outlined in
the Act.
Notice Period and Process for Involuntary Striking Off
Before striking off a company, the Registrar must serve a notice to the company and its directors,
giving them a chance to explain or resolve the issue. This is a safeguard to ensure that companies are
not wrongfully struck off without due process.
Impact on the Company’s Directors and Shareholders
The striking off of a company has significant legal and financial implications for its
directors and shareholders.
Legal Implications for Directors
Directors may face penalties for failing to meet statutory obligations. If a company is struck
off involuntarily, the directors could be held personally liable for any remaining liabilities.
Shareholders' Rights and Responsibilities
Once a company is struck off, shareholders may lose their ownership rights unless the company is
restored. However, they are entitled to any remaining assets after the company’s liabilities are
settled.
The Legal Procedure of Striking Off Under Section 248
The striking-off process under Section 248 follows a formal legal procedure. Here’s a step-by-step
breakdown:
Obligations of the Company Before Removal
Before the name is officially removed, the company must:
Consequences of Removal Under Section 248
When a company’s name is removed under Section 248, it ceases to exist legally. This means:
Restoration of a Company’s Name Under Section 248
If a company is struck off by mistake or due to unforeseen circumstances, it can apply for
restoration. The application must be made within the prescribed timeframe, typically
within 20 years from the date of removal.
Exceptions and Special Cases Under Section 248
Certain companies are exempt from being struck off under Section 248. This includes companies that
are undergoing liquidation or winding-up proceedings. Special cases may also arise where the company
disputes the grounds for removal.
Comparison with Other Sections of the Companies Act
While Section 248 deals with striking off, Section 271 governs
the formal winding-up of companies. Striking off is generally simpler and less
costly compared to winding-up, which is a court-driven process.
Case Studies of Striking Off Companies
Several companies have been struck off under Section 248. For example, companies that fail to
file annual returns or balance sheets for extended periods often face this outcome. Such cases
highlight the importance of compliance with statutory obligations.
Recent Amendments and Updates to Section 248
The Government of India has periodically updated Section 248 to enhance its
efficiency. These updates are designed to streamline the removal process and encourage companies to
comply with the regulations.
Conclusion
Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013, serves as a valuable tool for maintaining
the integrity of India’s corporate ecosystem. By allowing the removal of inactive companies,
it helps ensure that the register remains current and relevant.
FAQs
For more information contact us